You think Clarkson's car analogies are bad?

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 03/28/2016 at 15:16 • Filed to: None

2

8

The Dummy Gummy > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:23

1

Well at least no ones currently trapped a few hundred feet under the ground... right .... right?!

RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:24

9

Motor Trend - using odd and weak metaphors in an attempt to be forceful like Barry Bonds with a wiffle bat.

cletus44 aka Clayton Seams > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:28

1

new hat

Van Man, rocks the Man Van > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:30

3

I’ll use this opportunity to say that ever since DeMuro’s review of the new Land Cruiser, I totally understand their appeal. It may not be the best vehicle in its class, but it’s the one I’d buy and then DD for 15 years. And after seeing it’s capabilities at Rausch Creek, I’d take it there too if I had one.

Opposite Locksmith > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:30

2

Idk, it looks like a dog about to take shit

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:32

3

That metaphor is almost as painful as masturbating with bleach wipes.

RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > The Dummy Gummy 03/28/2016 at 15:32

1

*Resists urge to post Bee Gees’ New York Mining Disaster *

HammerheadFistpunch > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 03/28/2016 at 15:39

5

Bad metaphors are like edible underwear...they are no good and make you question everything.